I just finished reading Lies My Teacher Told Me by James Loewen. This is a very
thought-provoking book about how history and social studies are taught in our
high schools. The basic premise is that high school American history texts are
dumbed down, kept vanilla and don’t introduce controversy that could provoke
interesting discussion in school. Through publishers walking the political line
to get texts accepted in schools, to teachers not having time to check original
sources to augment text books, the picture portrayed by Loewen shows high
school students getting a bland picture of American history that primarily
promotes a “feel good” image of the United States being the “good guy.” One-sided
heroes are portrayed. One example: Woodrow Wilson is described as a promoter of
peace without his other side of starting a number of wars in Central America
and instigating racist policies in the Federal government. Another example:
Helen Keller’s struggle to overcome blindness and deafness is portrayed without
describing her adult life. She went on to become a radical socialist, a side of
her character that is not covered in high school history books.
With the polarization in politics in our country, an
implied message to me is it would be useful to have high school students
exposed to different viewpoints and discuss both the positive and negative of
historical people and the impact they have had on our country. Rather than rote
memorization, it would be constructive to have text books that challenge our
students to think and give them an opportunity to do research to understand
opposing positions on critical topics.
Loewan gives five questions that should be
considered in research. These apply equally to writers as to history students:
- When and why
was this written?
- Whose
viewpoint is presented?
- Is the
account believable?
- Is the
account backed up by other sources?
- How is
someone supposed to feel about the image portrayed?
Likewise, the message I took away from this book also
applies to mystery writing. As authors we need to have characters with
dimension. We can’t have protagonist that are only good and antagonist that are
only evil. Our heroes need flaws and our bad guys need to have redeeming
virtues. This makes the conflict in the story compelling and not just a
melodrama.
Mike Befeler
Mike Befeler
1 comment:
True, Mike, and likely to become truer, since deep, lively discussions could lead to political incorrectness and, consequently, lawsuits or at least a loss of employment.
I'll never forget hearing about the teacher who was reprimanded after some parents complained that she was foisting her own beliefs on her students. Her transgression? One child had punched another on the playground and she had asked him how he would feel if the other child had done that to him.
I like that list of questions we should ask when evaluating reference materials!
Post a Comment