Last Thursday I attended the second session of the
Mini-Law School at the University of Colorado in Boulder. The subject was civil
litigation. This was very timely since I had spent a good portion of the last
two weeks sitting in on a murder trial in Boulder: Michael Clark accused of
killing Marty Grisham in 1994. The professor indicated that civil and criminal
litigation differ but have some elements in common. Civil cases do not involve
criminal or administrative law but include cases dealing with topics such as contracts,
torts and property. Litigation is dispute resolution.
To put things in perspective, in 2008 in the US
there were 115 million cases of which 25 million dealt with civil matters. This
is a 67% growth since 1984. Any question of whether we’re a litigious society?
95% of civil cases are heard in state courts
(including traffic, municipal and small claims courts) and the rest in federal
courts. If you are injured, you have three choices: 1. Do nothing, 2. Proceed
independently, or 3. Contact an attorney. If litigation is pursued, the next
steps are: pleadings, discovery, summary judgment (if allowed), jury selection
(if a jury is involved), trial, verdict, post-trial motions, appeal (if any),
effect and enforcement. Enforcement is often an issue in civil litigation. You
might win but then spend years trying to collect from the other party.
The steps in a trial include: opening arguments,
prosecution evidence, defense evidence, closing arguments, jury instructions,
deliberation and verdict. These steps are similar to the criminal trial I’ve
been following. It went to the jury Thursday at noon and the jury deliberated
through Friday afternoon and will resume today (Monday).
The professor stated that our system gives full
leeway to the jury to make a decision. He cited a case where after a verdict
was rendered, it was discovered that the jury was drunk, sleeping most of the
time during deliberation and dealing drugs to each other. An appeal to throw
out the jury decision went to the Supreme Court, but it was not overturned. The
jury is a black box where no one outside can interfere, no matter how good or
bad the jury is. The only times action are taken are if a jury member is
threatened, bribed or a jury member does outside experiments or brings
something from outside into the jury deliberations (an example mentioned was a
jury member who brought in a Bible and consulted it).
Next session is environmental law.
Mike Befeler
Author of the Paul Jacobson Geezer-lit Mystery Series
1 comment:
Thanks, Mike. The ins and outs of the legal system are baffling to most of us. It seems to me our laws boil down to, "Don't hurt anybody, and don't take anybody else's stuff." But we've got to know more than that to write crime fiction that seems authentic.
Post a Comment