A facetious, totally unreliable
glimpse into academia.
DR MCBRIDE: Can’t it wait until
later? I really need to finish this critical analysis of that late Beethoven
quartet which…
PROFESSOR DEELEY: We don’t have
time, McBride. You know the date, I take it?
DM: Of course. it’s the 4th. Why?
PD: Yes, the 4th of December. They’ll
be here in a couple of weeks.
DM: But this Beethoven score – I’m
so close to finalising it. That b minor viola shift…
PD: I know the feeling only too
well, McBride. I felt exactly the same about what was to be my definitive
article on Tolstoy’s debt to Victor Hugo. But there are other considerations. We
must be realistic. We need to get ready.
DM: Damn. Every year it’s the
same. Every year I vow I’ll move to some respectable provincial university. But
I never do.
PD: And why would you? There’s
Oxbridge, us, and the rest are nowhere.
DM: I know that. But every
Christmas, with all the damned tourists, the carols, that absurd charity
pantomime. It’s so demeaning.
PD: Tradition, McBride. And, of
course, economics. They bring the dollars, we deck the halls with holly, ivy,
mistletoe and dress up like munchkins. It’s a small price to pay for 11 months
of academic freedom.
DM: Professor Deeley, I have a
PhD. I’ve published monographs on atonal shifts in Bartok.
PD: And your point is? Remember
that you’re speaking to the editor of two volumes of Dostoevsky’s
correspondence.
DM: I know. I remember the reviews
of it. An outstanding piece of work.
PD: Thank you.
DM: But also, in and of itself, a
confirmation that we should not need to do this … these Christmas things.
They’re demeaning.
PD: It’s what people expect. Who
are you this year?
DM: I’m sorry?
PD: In the … performance.
DM: Father John.
PD: Ah, showering reprobation from
the pulpit.
DM: That’s the cross I bear this
year. What about you?
PD: Well…
DM: You’re not driving the sleigh
again, are you?
PD: No, I…
DM: You’re Joseph.
PD: No.
DM: Not Mary, surely?
PD: Er…
DM: Professor Deeley, you seem
reluctant to divulge it. Is it something shameful?
PD: Not exactly. I’m … I’m the
beau.
DM: The beau?
PD: Yes. Under the mistletoe.
DM: I know where the bloody beau
goes.
PD: Please, McBride.
DM: And who’s the belle this year?
PD: Holly Devere.
DM: Holly Devere? The 4th
year medic? The one who does lap-dancing in the Union ?
PD: I believe so.
DM: You swine. I’ve been after her
for a month.
PD: Don’t you think I know that?
It’s damned embarrassing. Bad enough having to canoodle with a student without
knowing she’s … well, not mine. I didn’t choose her.
DM: Maybe not, but you’ll be doing
the canoodling with her. You swine. That should’ve been me.
PD: Has it occurred to you that
perhaps they wanted a beau who wouldn’t be a laughing stock?
DM: A laughing stock?
PD: Oh come, McBride, you may not
be a linguist but… Beau? Beautiful?
DM: What’s your point?
PD: Nothing of any consequence. Hugo’s
theory of the grotesque. Inner beauty is what counts. You may resemble
Quasimodo but I don’t doubt that, inside, you also have his capacity for love,
compassion.
DM: You patronising sod.
At which point, we leave the
Professor of European Literature and his colleague from the music department to
settle their academic differences with a mixture of vitriolic abstractions and
playground taunts, but with no danger of any physical contact. Their
Holly-induced enmity will, in due course, lead to McBride, during an enforced
leave of absence occasioned by the need to investigate a claim of sexual
harassment against him, penning a stinging refutation of Deeley’s interpretation
of Beowulf. Deeley, in turn, will use his influence to ensure that McBride
never gets to be the beau. And the tourists will be beguiled by a pantomime
which affirms the old enduring values.
So happy Christmas to you all and…
God bless us, every one!
I love this, Bill. It's so delightfully quirky and yet perfect for the season.
ReplyDelete